19(1)(f) and (g) of the Constitution inasmuch as-the said provisions constitute an arbitrary and unreasonable restriction on the said rights; and (2) the Chief Controller has not complied with the provisions of cl. The general principles laid down by the aforesaid Full Bench decision of the Labour Appellate Tribunal were generally approved by this Supreme Court lawyers in Muir Mills Co. Before closing the discussion, a reference to the decision of the Judicial Committee in Braja Sunder Deb v.

Rajendra Narayan Bhanj Deo (1) is necessary, as strong reliance is placed upon it in support of the contention that non- compliance of the mandatory provision of s. As per the investigation, Police recorded the statement of one Pradeep Kumar, s/o. nMohammedan law accords the custody of illegitimate children to the mother and her relations. Before the High Court, for the first time, a technical objection was taken.

The Subordinate Judge decreed the suit in terms of the compromise and a formal decree dated December, 22, 1922, was drawn and in the cause- title of the decree the manager of the Court of Wards was shown as second defendant while he should have been described as the -representative of the first defendant. There a suit between Raja Rajendra Narayan Bhanj Deo and Raja Braja Sunder Deb, who became the ward of the Court of Wards after the institution of the suit, was compromised.

The next aspect that has to be adverted to is under what situation, a Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable before a Division Bench. At that time, Bijender came there and both the appellants went inside. He stated that on May 27, 2001, he had went to the clinic of the appellant Indra Dalal for medical checkup of his wife. When she did not come out for some time, Pradeep Kumar went near the door, which was slightly open, and heard the talks of both the appellants, as per which Bijender was telling Indra Dalal that he had engaged Udeyveer for killing Nand Karan.

Daya Nand, on July 07, 2001, who was a resident of Charkhi Dadri. and (3) bonus is a temporary satisfaction, wholly or in part, of the needs of the employee where the capacity of the industry varies or is expected to vary from year to year, so that the industry cannot afford to pay 'living wages'. The conception of the living wage itself is a growing conception, and the goal has been reached in very few industries, if any, in this country. During investigation, a cream colour LML scooter bearing registration No.

The compromise petition was put in the Court and a decree was made thereon. We repeat at the cost of repetition, we have referred to series of judgments of this Court which have drawn the distinction between Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and the three-Judge Bench in Radhey Shyam (supra) has clearly stated that jurisdiction under Article 227 is distinct from jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution and, therefore, a letters patent appeal or an intra-court appeal in respect of an order passed by the learned Single Judge dealing with an order arising out of a proceeding from a Civil Court would not lie before the Division Bench Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 24AA of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 (7 of 1964), the Central Government hereby provides that no surtax shall be payable by such foreign companies.

This indicates that priority, preference and pre- eminence is given to the mother over the father of the concerned child The law follows the principle that the maternity of a child is established in the woman who gives birth to it, irrespective of the lawfulness of her connection with the begetter. 29 226 and labour contribute to the earnings of the industrial concern, it is fair that labour should derive some benefit, if there is a surplus after meeting prior or necessary charges; (2) the claim of bonus would only arise if there should be a residue after making provision for (a) prior charges and (b) a fair return on paid up capital and on reserves employed as working capital .

The Labour Appellate Tribunal recognised that where the goal of living wages had been attained, bonus like profit sharing in the technical, narrow sense would represent more the cash incentive to greater efficiency and production. HR 20G 1102 was recovered on July 13, 2001 from the old house of Indra Dalal vide recovery Exhibit PD. 9 and 10 of the Imports Control Order, 1955, (hereinafter called the Order) where under the licences were cancelled infringe the fundamental rights of a citizen under Art.

Furthermore, as per Section 8 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, which applies to Christians in India, the domicile of origin of an illegitimate child is in the country in which at the time of his birth his mother is domiciled. Purshottam Trikamdas, learned Counsel for the petitioners in support of his contentions raised before us two points, viz. However, paternity is inherently nebulous especially where the child is not an offspring of marriage.

56 would not affect the validity of the compromise decree.